Your pilot has stalled. Is it the tool, the process or the data?

Partly, and the memo says exactly which part. We take exports from MES, asset registers, maintenance, warehouse (WMS) and transport (TMS) systems like any other system, and match them against the ERP, order and finance records. We do not assess raw sensor streams or historian data, and we do not judge model quality. For a predictive maintenance or quality pilot, that means we test whether the asset, work-order and parts records the model depends on agree, and the scope line says what was left out. See manufacturing and logistics and distribution.

The vendor knows its tool, and it is also paid to keep the project going. We look at the data the tool is fed, across every system it touches, and the memo shows the records, so the vendor can check our reasoning as easily as you can.

Then the memo says so. If the records agree across systems and the exceptions trace back to the tool or the process, that is the finding, and it tells you where to push.

No. We work from exports of the systems the process reads from and writes to, plus the exception log if there is one. No logins and nothing installed.

No. We never fix what we find. You get a prioritised fix list with an owner, an effort estimate and a test for done on every item, written to hand to your own team or any outside firm.

A fixed fee, agreed before we start, that never moves with the verdict. It is a small fraction of the proposal it tests; if it wouldn’t be, we’ll tell you on the call. Our first clients get a founding rate in exchange for a private reference call once they’re happy with the work, only with their consent. We never name a client, fund or target publicly without written consent.